People decide.
Only where it matters.

Clean submissions approve themselves. Everything else lands in a queue that shows the evidence, the extracted fields, the rule that fired, and any matched duplicate on one screen. Approve, reject, or ask for a better capture. Every decision is logged.

Repair photographs and an invoice documenting an insurance claim.
Actions
Approve, reject, cancel, resolve fraud match, retry delivery
Surfaces
Admin app, or API and webhooks
Statuses
Created, processing, review, approved, synced, failed, capture blocked

What it does for you.

Exceptions, not everything

Reviewers see the small share of submissions that need judgement. Volume stops being a staffing problem.

Evidence beside the verdict

Photo or transcript, fields, reasons, and duplicate matches on one screen. No tab-hopping.

Full history

Each submission carries its event history: created, processed, flagged, reviewed, delivered, and by whom.

Works with your team or ours

Use the admin app with your reviewers, or approve and reject through the API from your own tools.

How it works in practice.

  1. Route

    Attention rules and fraud flags send submissions to review.

  2. Decide

    Approve, reject, or cancel, with a reason.

  3. Deliver

    Approved submissions continue to your systems automatically.

Where this earns its keep.

Use cases that lean on review queue the most.

See it work
on your evidence.

See review queue running on your own evidence. Thirty minutes, no slides.

Book a demo 30 minutes. Your use case. Real possibilities.