Whiteboard rules.
Machine enforcement.

Extraction gives you fields. Rules turn them into a verdict. Compare fields to each other or to limits, check dates against windows, sum line items against totals, and ask yes or no questions of photos and recordings. Every failed rule comes with the reason, so reviewers and customers know what to fix.

A shopper holding a receipt at a grocery checkout.
Rule types
Field relations (equals, at most, at least), item sums and counts, date windows, boolean questions
Severity
Informational or attention; attention routes to review
Verdicts
Approved, flagged for review, or blocked

What it does for you.

Relations and windows

Total equals the sum of items. Purchase date inside the campaign. Quantity at least two. Written once, applied to every submission.

Questions of the evidence

Is the disclosure present? Is the display mounted? Each question becomes a boolean field with a confidence score.

Severity, not just pass or fail

Mark a rule as informational or as requiring attention. Attention rules route to review. Informational ones annotate.

Reasons you can show

Each verdict carries the rule that fired and the values involved, ready for a reviewer screen or a customer message.

How it works in practice.

  1. Write the standard

    In your words. We encode it as rules and prompts.

  2. Test on history

    Run the rules against past submissions and tune thresholds.

  3. Ship and adjust

    Rules are versioned with the workflow. Tighten or loosen without breaking history.

Where this earns its keep.

Use cases that lean on verification rules the most.

See it work
on your evidence.

See verification rules running on your own evidence. Thirty minutes, no slides.

Book a demo 30 minutes. Your use case. Real possibilities.